Recently in Movies Category

And Now, Selected Thoughts About "G.I. Joe: The Rise of Cobra"

| No Comments
(As recently viewed on home video. Yes, by choice. Yes, I am a sad, sad man.)

- I must confess grudging respect for any movie based on a line of jingoistic 1980s soldier toys that inexplicably opens in 1641 France, with a complicated tale of political intrigue. I'm guessing director Stephen Sommers still had some Van Helsing sets he hadn't gotten around to using.

- Say, Christopher Eccleston: How's that decision to leave Doctor Who after 13 episodes working out for you? Wait, wait, before you answer, kindly take that chunk of scenery out of your mouth. (I kid because I love.)

- Very strange product placement here. I wasn't aware that eight-year-old boys were in the target market for Cisco Telepresence or Norton Antivirus software. (Also, seriously, when you are raiding top-secret files from an underground terrorist bunker, do you really have time to run a Norton scan? Even a Norton scan that runs so quickly, it effectively qualifies as science fiction?)

- I'm not sure which Hollywood mad scientist was able to teach a side of beef how to walk around saying stuff, but I'd like to know who thought it was a good idea to cast him as the lead in a big-budget summer blockbuster. Channing Tatum spends the entire movie with exactly one tone of voice (mono n' mumbly) and two facial expressions ("sleepy" and "vaguely hungry"). When it comes to acting range, the dude makes Eliza Dushku look like Meryl Streep.

- Even when he's carving himself a great big ol' slice of cinematic ham, Joseph Gordon-Levitt can act better with one eye, under several pounds of latex, than Channing Tatum can with his entire body. Also, I'd like to humbly submit that this movie be retitled either G.I. Joe: Joseph Gordon-Levitt Buys a House, or G.I. Joe: Because Indie Movies With Zooey Deschanel Don't Pay Squat.

- For a movie ostensibly aimed at children, there are a surprising number of lethal eye injuries and decapitations-by-explosion.

- The producers have shrewdly realized that it doesn't matter what dialogue they give Rachel Nichols, or how convincingly she delivers it, because no one will be paying any attention to that aspect of her performance anyway.

- The relationship between Scarlett and Ripcord seems perfectly calibrated to the tastes of a prepubescent audience: Girls are scary but also sorta fascinating, and you should be nice to them, and it's OK if one of them kisses you a little bit as long as you don't get all mushy about it. 

- Sienna Miller's cleavage deserves higher billing than Sienna Miller, I think. It gets more screen time and makes more of an impression.

- In all his scenes, Dennis Quaid looks distinctly like whatever he ate from Craft Services really did not agree with him.

- Ladies and gentlemen, a big hand for the Stephen Sommers Players! I mean, Arnold Vosloo would turn up (and, to be fair, be pretty dang awesome) for a hot meal, and it's always great to see Kevin J. O'Connor ooze across the screen, but Brendan Fraser cameoing as Flint? He must have a lot of free time on his hands these days.

- The only thing stopping Ray Park from being completely, stupidly awesome as Snake Eyes is that creepy Robocop mouth they've inexplicably molded into his mask. It makes him look all mopey and emo. Dear Producers: We aren't supposed to empathize with the creepy silent ninja badass.

- Wait, why the hell do you even need a French particle accelerator to activate your weaponized nanomites? (Suddenly, I feel like Geordi LaForge for some reason.) Did they have a few million dollars left in the CGI and set budgets, and just go, "Eh, why not?"

- I think the movie started to win me over when 10-year-old flashback versions of Snake Eyes and Storm Shadow beat the holy living hell out of each other -- actual blood! -- in a no-holds-barred kung fu battle. But I didn't fully surrender to its charms until the fast, whizzy, gloriously insane Paris chase scene. I'm sorry, but there are few things more certifiably awesome than a ninja riding an SUV while surfing over entire automobiles being thrown at him, as a pair of cyborgs and a hot chick on a motorcycle plow through traffic in hot pursuit. Especially if it all culminates in the destruction of the Eiffel Tower.

- CGI polar bear. CGI POLAR BEAR. CGI POLAR BEAR!

- Despite being the guy stuck delivering technobabble in a not-very-good movie, Said Taghmaoui is pretty dang entertaining.

- When did Mr. Eko become a gay soccer hooligan?

- For a big, loud, stupid movie based on children's toys, this film can be shockingly competent. The big action scenes are coherently shot and never confusing, the flashbacks are effectively structured, some of the editing and stunt work is really quite good, and the finale manages to give each of the six (!) main characters something convincingly vital to do. It's a far better film than either of Michael Bay's Transformers movies -- and way less creepily fetishistic of the U.S. military to boot.

- President Zartan? *slow clap* Oh, Stephen Sommers, I can almost forgive you for Van Helsing now. Almost.

Fun with HD

| No Comments
tivo_logo_print.jpgA few months ago I got my first HDTV, a nice big 50-inch Samsung plasma.  It's only 720p but it was on sale (since plasmas are being discontinued).

Until recently I didn't have any true HD sources.  I have my PC hooked up to it and it does some silly resolution like 1600x1200 or something, but it's run through the analog VGA port and so not really true HD.  It looks lovely, but it's not as good as it can get.  Also, I don't have a remote control for the damned thing.

Last week I finally went ahead and sprung for a TiVo HD and Verizon FiOS.  Now I have true HD through the HDMI port.  Even at only 720p, it's still excellent.

Some notes now that I've been watching true HD:

eva_mendes.jpg
  • Plus:  I can actually watch sports.  Football and baseball are really interesting now that I can see what's going on.  We've watched the NLCS and ALCS games over the past week and they've been great.  On the instant replay you can even see how the pitcher is holding and releasing the ball.  You can clearly see when a player gets spiked.  Very cool.  (Also:  Watching the Yankees play L.A. I couldn't help but wonder, do white people play baseball any more?)
  • Minus:  I can now get a really good look at things no one should have to see.  I watched "Ghost Rider" the other day.  Lots of guys think Eva Mendes is hot.  In HD, she looks like a transvestite.  She practically has an adam's apple.
  • Neither:  If you watch The Price Is Right in HD, when they reveal some awesomely shiny appliance, you can see the camera and crew reflected in the enamel.

Blink BOOM

| 6 Comments
harrypotter.jpgI saw Harry Potter and the Endless Franchise the other day.  (Can you remember a time when we weren't watching Harry Potter movies?  Can you imagine a time when we won't be?)  I don't want to review the movie, really, except to note that it's one of those middle-of-a-series movies where plot threads are mainly carried forward and nothing is really resolved; if you haven't been paying attention to the whole series none of it will make the slightest sense; and even though I'd read and enjoyed the book I spent most of the movie slightly bewildered and confused anyway.

I may have been more addled than usual, though, thanks to the movie trailers preceding the main film.  The previews were for some remarkably adult, violent movies, including 2012, the upcoming end-of-the-world flick starring John Cusack (was Nicolas Cage too busy doing Knowing?) from the overwrought forge of Roland Emmerich; and also a version of Sherlock Holmes starring Robert Downey Jr. as the great detective and Jude Law as Watson, which casting makes it sound awesome, except judging by the trailer someone decided, for reasons entirely unclear to me, to make Sherlock (not to mention Downey) into a martial arts action hero.
johncusack.small.jpg
All of which is bad enough, honestly.  But what really got to me is this new style of trailer I've been seeing far too much of lately.  I'm guessing that, in a world where the In a World Guy is dead, and anyway where he spent the last decade or so satirizing himself (and being satirized), in that world we need some new movie trailer cliche we can have beat into our foreheads, and this is it:  The Blink BOOM Trailer.

That's where we get a quick shot, usually of something supposedly unspeakable happening, and then a rapid fade to black while the soundtrack goes BOOM!  This is followed by another quick shot, rapid fade, BOOM!  Over and over.  It's like being hit in the head with a bat repeatedly.

I'd rather the movie studios just hire a really big scary guy to come into the theater and say, "If you don't go see Roland Emmerich's latest masterpiece I'M GOING TO KICK YOUR ASS!"  Because, whether I did or didn't go see it, the experience would be less painful than the Blink BOOM Trailer.




Mister, we could use a leading man like Walter Matthau again

| No Comments
matthauvswashington.jpg
Did you see the Taking of Pelham One Two Three remake this weekend? Me, neither. And why should you? By most (but not all) accounts, it's a by-the-numbers Tony Scott picture that borrows the title and a few other conceits from the 1974 original, but lacks the humor (and the score) that made the first film a cult classic. (This was entirely predictable, of course.)

Christian Toto picks up a theme that Joel Mathis raised in our podcast a few weeks back: Could a guy like Walter Matthau, the hero of the original Pelham One Two Three, ever get cast as the lead in an action drama today? Toto explores some possibilities in his latest article for BoxOffice.com. Fact is, Toto writes, "Few of today's biggest stars look like the guy or gal one might find sitting next to them on a subway."

Are there exceptions? Sure. Toto mentions some. We discussed some in the podcast, and even named our candidate for the 21st century's Walter Matthau. Hint: He's never played an action hero, but he was the villain once.

What's the score?

| 2 Comments
Thumbnail image for up_pixar_one-sheet_poster_02.jpg

I love film music. Love it. One of the first LPs I ever bought with my own money was a John Williams soundtrack (although I'm embarrassed to admit which one.) I'll often buy soundtracks to movies I haven't seen or have no plans of seeing anytime soon. Carter Burwell's score to Twilight, for example. 

So it was only a matter of time, I suppose, before my collaborator Joel Mathis and I did a podcast about movies and their soundtracks. We had a lively and wide-ranging discussion this weekend with Washington Times critic/Denver film maven Christian Toto and Fistful of Soundtracks host, blogger and fledgling comics writer Jimmy J. Aquino. I read Toto's reviews religiously and I've been a fan of Aquino's Internet radio show for years, and so it was a real treat to talk to them both. Among the topics we discussed:

Alas, none of us had seen UP when we recorded this episode, but if we had, I might have confessed to bawling through half the movie. Because I'm a sap. But I would also have made the point -- as if it really needed to be made -- that much of what makes UP so memorable and poignant, especially in the film's opening scenes, is Michael Giacchino's score. Giacchino, of course, gave us the music to the Star Trek reboot. And he also did the soundtrack for the upcoming Land of the Lost. (Ah well, two out of three ain't bad.)

After you've listened to the podcast, I hope you'll visit What Would Toto Watch and A Fistful of Soundtracks. And graphic novel fans may want to check out Secret Identities: The Asian American Superhero Anthology, which feature's Aquino's story, "Sampler."

Up

| No Comments
Up is really, really good.  Go see it.  I cried.

So I saw this fan trailer for “Green Lantern” on YouTube, which is basically an “Oh, Nathan Fillion, you’re so heroic!” love letter, and to each their own, but man, oh man, please do not make “Green Lantern” as the cult of Hal Jordan’s personality.

Comic movies as origin stories are played out and boring, and I really think any Green Lantern movie should take a cue from J.J. Abrams’ rebooting of the “Star Trek” franchise, toss all eleventy-billion decades of backstory out the window — fanboys, simply knowing all this minutiae is reward enough — and make a straight-up action flick. Call it “Lantern Corps” And make it thusly:

Hal Jordan (Dennis Quaid) and Guy Gardner (Bruce Campbell, playing the comic relief for sure) are tasked with training Earth’s two newest Lanterns, Kyle Rainer (Josh Hartnett) and Jon Stewart (Tristan Wilds). Kyle is, of course, an artiste and super-sensitive and oh, how he sees Hal Jordan as a respected father figure. Jon is straight out of the stint in the Marine Corps he planned on using to pay for architecture school. He is not so jazzed to be a Lantern, and unfortunately, Hal doesn’t know how to get through to him.

Even more unfortunately, Hal doesn’t get a chance to figure it out, because Sinestro (Clive Owen) kills him. All the new recruits know is that Sinestro was the guy who trained Hal. And if Hal couldn’t take his old teacher what chance do they — incompletely trained by the perpetually hung-over Guy — stand?

And so the movie unfolds. Extraterrestrial Lanterns come in to help out (including Kilowogg, as played by Duane Johnson), Kyle keeps his girlfriend from getting stuffed in a fridge, Jon eventually comes around because he’s secretly one hell of a guy, there’s a big battle with Sinestro, and at the very end — we have two new Earth Lanterns who have managed to hold off Sinestro Corps. Perhaps there’s an Easter egg at the very end of the movie where we see both Lanterns walking into a Justice League meeting.

(The sequel gets called “Green Lantern” and it tracks Kyle and John’s falling out. But I’m getting ahead of myself.)

My main point here: a movie is not a comic book. It’s not a validation of years of fandom and storytelling, it’s not a multimillion-dollar valentine to the fewer than one million people who read comics in the U.S., it’s not a chance for the self-reinforcing nature of fandom to impose its taste on a wider audience. It’s not repeating the same old story over and over again. A movie is a chance to pick up some of the best beloved aspects of a story from another medium, and to make them dance within the confines of a finite running time, gilded by the sheer gigantic scope of special effects.

So let go of the past. You have nothing to lose but your inherently contradictory continuity.

Siskel & Ebert & Roeper & Rotten Tomatoes

| 5 Comments

rotten-tomatoes.jpg

I used to watch “Siskel & Ebert,” and later “Ebert & Roeper,” religiously. Not because I was ever a heavy moviegoer, but because I was curious about what what going on in the popular culture and I wanted to know what movies to rent when they came to video. Later, after welcoming two babies into my family, watching a show about movies became a nice escape from the cold reality of many years without any movie-theater viewing whatsoever.

When Ebert left the balcony due to surgery complications that robbed him of his ability to speak (but not write — he’s still reviewing movies and even blogging), I kept on watching. Ebert’s partner, Richard Roeper, had grown on me. And I still needed to know about the movies that were arriving in theaters.

Recently the Ebert & Roeper train came to an end, their program altered by its distributor into a movie-slash-entertainment plugfest hosted by two gibbons. As I removed the show from my Season Pass list, I mourned a little bit.

So here’s the good news: I’ve found a replacement. “The Rotten Tomatoes Show” on Current TV isn’t the same show as Ebert and Roeper’s show, not by a mile. It only covers a handful of movies a week, and it’s a week late in covering them. And yet, I love it.

Here’s how “The Rotten Tomatoes Show” fulfills me: It’s an half-hour show about movies that fills me with knowledge about the latest releases while keeping me entertained. Hosts Ellen Fox and Brett Erlich are smart and funny — and Erlich’s penchant for wearing classic “Real Genius” t-shirts suggests that he is a man with impeccable movie taste. (That’s International Order for Gorillas up there.)

The show itself works like this: The hosts watch three new movies, and solicit video comments from the users of RottenTomatoes.com and Current TV. Each review, a montage of the hosts’ and viewers’ comments, encapsulates the movie pretty well, and many are laugh-out-loud funny. When all is said and done, the show also reveals the movie’s final Tomatometer score, indicating the critical consensus for the flick. In addition, there are reviews of new DVDs, reviews in haiku and DVD form, and a weekly list on silly topics like the best monsters or best car chases in the history of film.

So… smart and funny people talking about movies? I’m sold. Is “The Rotten Tomatoes Show” going to change the world? No, no it’s not. But as a replacement for the late, lamented “Ebert & Roeper,” It’ll do nicely.

(“The Rotten Tomatoes Show” premieres Thursdays at 10:30 on Current TV, located on DirecTV 358, Dish Network 196, and Comcast 107, and then repeats endlessly throughout the week.)

Drop the Article, Win the World

| 1 Comment
jordana-brewster-fast-and-furious-4.jpgAs if there aren't enough reasons to worry for the state of civilization, Fast & Furious managed to have the best opening weekend of 2009 despite being such an obvious retread of the first not very good movie Universal couldn't even invent a new name for it. It beat out the equally obviously mediocre Monsters vs. Aliens, the main purpose of which seemed to be furthering the experiment to calculate, to the third decimal place, how quickly Seth Rogen can wear out his welcome. And that film topped Watchmen's opening weekend. At least one movie's strong opening makes some kind of sense: Who didn't want to see Billy Crudup naked?
20090309_doctormanhattan_190x190.jpg
All of this horror pales, however, if you give in to your curiosity and visit Box Office Mojo to see that the top domestic gross taken by any film this year so far is $143 million or so for Paul Blart: Mall Cop. Which can only mean there's more Kevin James in our future.

Unfortunately, Kevin James' particular brand of mediocrity has been found to penetrate even the most robust bomb shelter, so this Apocalypse will be unpleasantly complete.

Why Do I Hurt Myself?

| 1 Comment
lovegurunewtrailer.jpg
I watched The Love Guru a few days ago. It was terrible, of course. I wouldn't have watched it otherwise. In fact, the only reason I hadn't watched it already is that it took a few months for people to convince me that it really was that bad.

I like to watch bad movies because, as Tolstoy said, every good movie is the same, but every terrible movie is terrible in its own way. Once you break yourself out of the bonds of competence, you can see crazy things that no sensible director would put in a movie. A true explorer has to go off the map in order to see something new. And in the case of The Love Guru, I saw things that I had, in fact, never seen before. See the expression Mike Myers is making in that picture? He does that through the entire movie. Every time he makes a joke, he wriggles with delight and flashes a coy "Ain't I funny?" smirk at the camera. The problem with that question is that the answer is invariably "Nope. Not really." It's just an unending stream of unfunny jokes followed immediately by someone mugging like he thinks he's Oscar Wilde and the Ritz Brothers all rolled into one. Which I would enjoy seeing.

But it wasn't really amazing. It was no Cutthroat Island (which is one of my favorite movies, incidentally). I've seen Mike Myers not be funny before. I hadn't seen him be this devoid of humor for quite this long before, but I could have pictured it. Still, I had to watch it, just in case. You never know, right?

Nothing Moves the Blob, Except Jenny Craig!

| 2 Comments
Speaking of X-Men Origins: Wolverine, I found out that the Blob is being played by Kevin Durand. You probably remember Durand as the bad-ass mercenary from the fourth season of Lost. What you probably don't remember is Durand being enormously fat. (He's apparently really tall, though.)
kevindurand.jpg
This bothers me. Couldn't the producers find an authentically fat actor to play the Blob? I can't believe no one was available. Having a mesomorph play one of the few superpowered ectomorphs is insulting to fat people everywhere; they might as well get Sylvester Stallone to play Luke Cage in blackface.
720807-blob_wraith_super.png
It's the sad fate of fat actors in Hollywood: Sure, they're fine to play the bodies of fat characters in movies like Shallow Hal and Norbit, but as soon as we need a face, we're getting a real thin actor in there, like Gwyneth Paltrow or Eddie Murphy. How crappy must that be, to have your body used as the cellulite-ridden jiggly butt of a movie full of jokes with someone else's head stuck on it? Your thighs and gut put on a great performance, but keep your fatty face to yourself, meatball! Then there's Simon Pegg starring in a movie called Run Fatboy Run. Simon Pegg is not a fat boy. How did he sit next to Nick Frost for at least two movies and still think he qualified for the fat guy role?

And does anyone besides me remember Dom DeLuise in Fatso? I saw a few minutes of that movie on some obscure satellite channel a few months ago and was horrified to discover that I'm at least twice the size DeLuise was then, and that I'd kill to be as small as he was. He'd probably kill, too, considering he's about nine hundred pounds these days. Did DeLuise retire or did his craft services costs get too high?

Is that why they didn't get him to play the Blob?


Wolverine Pirated, and I Don't Care

| 7 Comments
huge-ackman.jpgYesterday I was in the studio I share with Reilly Brown, erstwhile Cable & Deadpool penciller, and Chris Irving, comic book writer. Reilly said something about the upcoming movie Wolverine having been pirated and already released online, and both Chris and he were saying things like "What kind of jerk would do such a thing?"

I jumped in because, with these guys, I'm not afraid of sounding like an idiot. They already know I'm an idiot. "Who cares?" I asked.

Reilly's opinion is that now the movie's box office will be ruined. "Most comic fans have seen the trailers already and know it's going to suck, so they're only going to go so they can see how bad it is. And now they won't have to, they can just download it."

"And think of all the creators who worked on the movie, what about them?" added Chris.

As far as that goes, I'm pretty sure all the gaffers and best boys and hot-gluers got paid already.

As far as Reilly's point, though, I think it's amusing, because I'm a comic fan, and an old-time X-Men collector, and this is the first X-movie I've actually been interested in seeing. Comic fans of my acquaintance really liked the first X-movie, and the director Bryan Singer gained a lot of cred in comic circles -- where he was even forgiven for the aggressively mediocre Superman Returns -- but about the best I could say about it was it was better than I expected. Since I expected it to be the worst superhero movie of all time, this isn't saying much. The second X-movie was less good, and I never bothered with the third one. I just didn't need another two hours or so of underlit cranky mutant angst and blurry CGI, not even for brief shots of Rebecca Romijn essentially naked.

But Wolverine looks pretty cool. Not, you know, great or anything. I mean, isn't Liev Schreiber just too limp-wristed and sensitive an actor to pull off a feral villain named for a giant prehistoric carnivore? Maybe part of why it looks good to me is none of the characters aside from Wolverine had really gained prominence before I stopped collecting. Chris said, "I really want to see them do Gambit well." Who? Name rings a bell. Wasn't he one of the New Mutants or something Art Adams used to draw? Do we give a crap about him now?

In any case, I can't imagine the pirated version making a difference to the movie's bottom line. If anything it might help by generating even more buzz, although the damned thing's being marketed so strongly I can't imagine squeezing any more out of it. Still, Reilly eventually became sanguine about the financial damage: "Fox deserves whatever it gets for how the movie ruins Deadpool."

Who?

The Incomparable "Watchmen" brain drump

| 4 Comments

watchmen-poster.jpg

You may have heard that in March, the movie “Watchmen” came out. And comic book geeks everywhere had a great, big freak-out. As did the unsuspecting public who walked into the film expecting to see a quirky romantic comedy about night watchmen.

We’re on the geeky side. Which is why we ended up debating the merits of “Watchmen,” in film and in graphic-novel form, on our little private mailing list that you aren’t invited to. Here’s a glimpse into the discussion.

 

About this Archive

This page is an archive of recent entries in the Movies category.

Comics is the previous category.

Music is the next category.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

TeeVee Archive

Yes, you can still read recent old stuff from TeeVee here. Older stuff is coming... later.